VinFunPark
VinFunPark
ISSN 2617-4162 e-ISSN 2617-4170

Social and Legal Studios

Current

Social and Legal Studios

Vol. 9, No. 2, 2026

Social and Legal Studios

ISSN 2617-4162

e-ISSN 2617-4170

Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Received 09.02.2026, Revised 04.05.2026, Accepted 27.05.2026 Published 01.06.2026
Article

European social standards in the era of labour digitalisation


Abstract

The article examined European social standards for the protection of individual labour rights through the prism of the jurisprudence of the European Committee of Social Rights in the context of labour digitalisation, the expansion of platform work, and the transformation of contemporary employment relations. The relevance of the study was determined by the need to adapt national labour law systems to modern socio-economic challenges and to ensure the effective implementation of the standards of the European Social Charter in Ukraine during the period of war and European integration processes. The purpose of the article was to analyse the transformation of individual labour rights from programmatic social guarantees into practical and effective subjective rights and to determine the impact of the jurisprudence of the European Committee of Social Rights on the development of modern labour law models. The study applied a combination of general scientific and special legal methods, included the legal-dogmatic method, comparativelegal method, functional approach, and qualitative content analysis of the decisions of the European Committee of Social Rights and contemporary legal scholarship. The research findings demonstrated that the concept of “practical and effective rights” has become the key mechanism for ensuring the real effectiveness of social rights within the European legal space. The study established that the recent practice of the European Committee of Social Rights gradually adapts the European social model to the challenges of algorithmic management and platform work. The article introduced the concept of “procedural non-compliance,” describing situations in which European standards are formally transposed into national legislation without the creation of effective enforcement mechanisms. It was substantiated that the primary threat to the effectiveness of social standards lies in the formalistic implementation of European norms without adequate institutional and financial support. The practical value of the study lies in developing recommendations for improving Ukrainian labour legislation, strengthening labour rights enforcement mechanisms, and ensuring the practical effectiveness of European social standards within the national legal system


Keywords: European Social Charter; individual labour rights; European Committee of Social Rights; platform work; algorithmic management; practical and effective rights


Suggested citation

Cherevko, N. (2026). European social standards in the era of labour digitalisation. Social and Legal Studios, 9(2), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2026.56
References
  1. Adams-Prassl, J., Aloisi, A., Countouris, N., De Stefano, V., & Rainone, S. (2025). Protecting platform workers in the European Union. European Labour Law Journal, 16(4), 427-431. doi: 10.1177/20319525251376935. 
  2. Alauddin, F.D., Aman, A., Ghazali, M.F., & Daud, S. (2025). The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic review. Heliyon, article number e41491. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41491.
  3. Aloisi, A. (2024). Regulating algorithmic management at work in the European Union: Data protection, non-discrimination and collective rights. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 40(1), 37-70. doi: 10.54648/ IJCL2024001.
  4. Casla, K. (2026). The social right to property: Social function and human rights (1st ed.). London: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781035339181.
  5. Cherevko, N. (2025). Mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of the European Social Charter and their significance for the Member States. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 30(1), 60-70. doi: 10.63341/naiaherald/1.2025.60.
  6. Coker, J.O., Ijiga, A.C., Uzougbo, N.S., Oguejiofor, B.B., & Akagha, O.V. (2023). The impact of labor laws on fundamental human rights in the workplace: a comparative analysis between nigeria and the United States. Social Values & Society, 5(2), 54-58. doi: 10.26480/svs.02.2023.54.58.
  7. Complaint of the European Committee of Social Rights No. 234/2024 “Confederazione Unitaria di Base (CUB) v. Italy”. (2024, June). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter.
  8. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights “Conclusions 2022: France – Fair Remuneration”. (2023a). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/conclusions-2022-france-e/1680aa9869.
  9. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights “Conclusions 2025: Ukraine”. (2026). Retrieved from https://rm.coe. int/conclusions-2025-ukraine-en/48802a4e71.
  10. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights “Conclusions 2022: Italy – Right to Fair Remuneration and Labour Rights”. (2023b). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/conclusions-2022-italy-e/1680aa986d.
  11. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights “European Committee of Social Rights’ Conclusions on Labour Rights”. (2023c). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/european-committee-of-social-rights-conclusions-on-labourrights.
  12. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights XIV-2. (1998, November). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng#{%22sort%22:[%22escpublicationdate%20descending%22],%22escdcidentifier%22:[%22XIV-2_Ob_V1-11/Ob/ EN%22]}.
  13. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights XV-2. (2001, February). Retrieved from https://books.google.tg/ books?id=A1BtcLi5IkQC
  14. Conclusions of the European Committee of Social Rights XVIII-1. (2006, December). Retrieved from https://books.google.tg/ books?id=ukCq4S1z8DQC&printsec=frontcover&hl=fr#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  15. Convention on Human Rights. (1950, November). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ eng.
  16. Council of Europe. (2025). Decisions adopted by the European Committee of Social Rights at its 350th session. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter/news-related-to-the-european-committee-of-social-rights/-/asset_ publisher/8HnJlWtDdtTT/content/decisions-adopted-by-the-european-committee-of-social-rights-at-its-350th-session.
  17. Cullen, H. (2021). The collective complaints system of the European Social Charter: Interpretative methods of the European Committee of Social Rights. European Journal of Social Security, 23(1), 3-21. doi: 10.1177/1388262721994277.
  18. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights in Case No. 55/2009 “Confédération Générale du Travail (CGT) v. France”. (2010, September). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-55-2009-dmerits-en.
  19. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 208/2022 “Unione Sindacale di Base (USB) v. Italy”. (2024, December). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-208-2022-dmerits-en.
  20. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 207/2022 “Unión General de Trabajadores (UGT) v. Spain”. (2024, December). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-207-2022-dmerits-en.
  21. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 14/2003 “International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) v. France”. (2004, September). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-14-2003-dmerits-en.
  22. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 88/2012 “Finnish Society of Social Rights v. Finland”. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-88-2012-dmerits-en.
  23. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 218/2022 “Confederación Sindical de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v. Spain”. (2024, December). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-218-2022-dmerits-en.
  24. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 226/2023 “Fédération SUD Santé-Sociaux v. France”. (2024, December). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/?i=cc-226-2023-dmerits-en.
  25. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on Complaint No. 11/2001 “European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. Portugal”. (2002, May). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng/?i=cc-11-2001-dmerits-en&utm.
  26. Decision of the European Committee of Social Rights on the Merits of the Complaint No. 158/2017 “Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy’”. (2019, September). Retrieved from https://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-158-2017-dmeritsen.
  27. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2024/2831/EU “On Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work”. (2024, October). Retrieved from https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-89-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
  28. Dockès, E. (2019). New trade union strategies for new forms of employment. European Labour Law Journal, 10(3), 219-228. doi: 10.1177/2031952519870061.
  29. Khainska, O. (2026). Ukraine in the global tourism space: Analysis of international cooperation and adaptation to european union standards. Management, 42(2), 96-108. doi: 10.30857/2415-3206.2025.2.8.
  30. Kotliarova, I.Yu. (2025). Ensuring fair working conditions and protection of workers’ rights in the digital age. Actual Problems of Law: Theory and Practice, 50(2), 118-133. doi: 10.33216/2218-5461/2025-50-2-118-133.
  31. Kotsoni, M. (2025). The protection of the right to energy through the European Social Charter. Human Rights Law Review, 25(4), article number ngaf029. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngaf029.
  32. Krutylin, S. (2025). Platform business models as drivers of digitalisation and labor market transformation. Sustainable Economic Development, 3(54), 334-341. doi: 10.32782/2308-1988/2025-54-51.
  33. Labour Code of Ukraine. (1996, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/322-08/ed19960723.
  34. Nalyvaiko, L.R. (2025). European standards of citizens’ rights to social protection. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 4, 422-427. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2025.04.3.62.
  35. Papadopoulos, N.A. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of the European Social Charter: A case study on dismissal reforms. European Papers: A Journal on Law and Integration, 7(3), 1569-1592. doi: 10.15166/2499-8249/628.
  36. Parpworth, N. (2025). 9. EU law. In Constitutional and administrative law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Perehudova, T. (2025). Employment in digital platforms in the context of decent work. Economy of Ukraine, 68(2), 71-85. doi: 10.15407/economyukr.2025.02.071.
  38. Pilatti, G.R. (2024). Systematic literature review on gig economy: Power dynamics and worker agency. Economies, 14(10), article number 267. doi: 10.3390/economies14100267. 
  39. Ploszka, A. (2026). Economic and social rights in Central and Eastern Europe: A constitutional laboratory. In M. Langford & K.G. Young (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic and social rights. Oxford: Oxford Academic Press. doi: 10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780197550021.013.13.
  40. Polomarkakis, K.A. (2025). A culture of commodification? Labour rights in the charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. Industrial Law Journal, 54(1), 117-148. doi: 10.1093/indlaw/dwae019.
  41. Rainone, S. (2025). The collective rights dimension of the Platform Work Directive: Assessing regulatory effectiveness in the digital labour context. European Labour Law Journal, Special Issue: Protecting Platform Workers in the European Union. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5494054.
  42. Revised European Social Charter. (1996, May). Retrieved from  https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/fulllist?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=163.
  43. Smusz-Kulesza, M. (2024). Challenges of implementation of the revised european social charter standards in Poland – selected issues. European Studies – the Review of European law, Economics and Politics, 11(2), 199-214. doi: 10.2478/eustu-2024-0022.
  44. Zadorozhnyi, B.Y. (2025). Legal regulation of gig work in Ukraine in the context of European integration. Uzhhorod National University Herald Series Law, 5(91), 119-127. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2025.91.5.17.