VinFunPark
Logo SLS
Logo SLS
Submit an article
VinFunPark
ISSN 2617-4162 e-ISSN 2617-4170

Social and Legal Studios

All Issues
Submit an article

Current

Social and Legal Studios

Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026

Social and Legal Studios

ISSN 2617-4162

e-ISSN 2617-4170

Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Received 05.12.2025, Revised 02.03.2026, Accepted 25.03.2026 Published 01.04.2026
Pages 9-16
https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2026.09
Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026
Article

Rethinking the features of the object of a criminal offence in the digital age


Abstract

The paper develops the author’s concept of “rheme” as a new optional feature of the object of a criminal offence. The initial position of the study is the recognition that the contemporary criminal law theory, built on materialistic ideas about the subject of a criminal offence, loses its explanatory power in the conditions of digitalisation, virtualisation, and dematerialisation of public life. Offences in the field of information technology, cybersecurity, digital assets, and in the field of intellectual activity often do not have a material subject in the classical sense, but cause real damage to protected social values. This necessitates an update of the theoretical model of the composition of a criminal offence. Based on linguistic and semiotic concepts and interdisciplinary approaches, a three-level model of the object of the composition of a criminal offence was proposed: social relations (basic level), subject (material level), and rheme (semantic or non-material level). This model provides a holistic coverage of both material and informational forms of socially dangerous influence. The result of the research was the formulation of the concept of rheme of a criminal offence as a semiotic category that reflects the transition of criminal law thinking from the material to the information and semantic level. Influence on rheme was interpreted as an informational or energetic form of illegal action that changes the state of social relations without physical contact with material objects. As a result, it was proved that the introduction of rheme into the system of optional features of the object of the composition of a criminal offence deepens the methodology of criminal law, expands its conceptual framework, and contributes to the adaptation of the criminal law doctrine to the realities of digital civilisation. The concept of rheme opens up new opportunities for the qualification of crimes in cyberspace and forms the basis for further development of the semiotic information paradigm of criminal law science


Keywords: criminal law; elements of the crime; subject; rheme; non-material phenomena; semiotics of law; information reality


Suggested citation

Hazdayka-Vasylyshyn, I. (2026). Rethinking the features of the object of a criminal offence in the digital age. Social and Legal Studios, 9(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2026.09
References
  1. Aliieva, A. (2021). The subject of a criminal offence: concept, types and significance. (PhD dissertation, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Kharkiv, Ukraine).
  2. Debons, A., Horne, E., & Cronenweth, S. (1988). Information science: An integrated view. Boston: G.K. Hall.
  3. Decision of the Criminal Cassation Court of the Supreme Court in Case No. 715/758/20. (2022, November). Retrieved from https://lpd.court.gov.ua/legal-position/7871/document/14543.
  4. Demydova, L. (2015). Incorporeal thing as the subject of a crime. Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2(81), 101-108.
  5. Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language. (n.d.). Definition of the term “object”. Retrieved from https://slovnyk.ua/index.php?swrd=%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82.
  6. Dolianovska, I., & Kryvenko, K. (2024). Global experience in combating criminal offences related to the circulation of virtual assets. Legal Bulletin, 2(12), 80-86. doi: 10.31732/2708-339X-2024-12-A12.
  7. Dudorov, O., & Stryzhevska, A. (Eds.). (2025). Criminal law. General part (Ukrainian-European studies): Textbook in 2 books. Kyiv: Norma Prava.
  8. Floridi, L. (2011). The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001.
  9. Hazdayka-Vasylyshyn, I. (2024). Rhema as an element of the structure of a criminal offence. In Ukrainian criminal justice in the post/war paradigm: Materials of the X (XXIII) Lviv Criminal Justice Forum (pp. 25-30). Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.
  10. Kocherhan, M. (2001). Introduction to linguistics. Kyiv: Academia.
  11. Koops, B.-J. (2012). Criminal law and cyberspace as a challenge for legal research. Scripted, 9(3), 277-297.
  12. Kryshevich, O., & Roschyna, I. (2022). Cryptocurrency as a subject of criminal offenses against property: National and international law. Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: Law, 23-24, 168-175. doi: 10.34079/2226-3047-2022-12-23-24-168-175.
  13. Lee, L. (2024). Examining the legal status of digital assets as property: A comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4807135.
  14. Ovsiichuk, T. (2025). Theoretical and legal aspects of defining virtual assets as the subject of illicit enrichment. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 79, 148-154. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2025.88.3.23.
  15. Pavlyshyn, O. (2018). Semiotics of law as a methodological paradigm of the latest philosophical-legal discourse. (PhD dissertation, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine).
  16. Pchelina, O. (2022). On the question of criminal procedural regulation of the term “electronic assets obtained by criminal route”. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 71, 327-332. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.71.55.
  17. Serkevych, I., Yevkhutych, I., Hazdayka-Vasylyshyn, I., Sozanskiy, T., & Pasyeka, O. (2019). Mechanism of legal regulation of fight against cybercrime in Ukraine. Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory, 22(6).
  18. Sewell, O., Robb, L., & Flood, J. (2024). Asset, token, or coin? A semiotic analysis of blockchain language. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37. doi: 10.1007/s11196-023-10083-2.
  19. Shchehlakov, I. (2025). Problems of differentiating crypto-terms in the qualification of criminal offenses against property. Bulletin of the Criminal Law Association of Ukraine, 1(23), 225-246. doi: 10.21564/2311-9640.2025.23.331560.
  20. Shtanko, V. (2025). The effectiveness of criminal law regulation of relations in the intellectual property field under the conditions of digital transformation. (PhD dissertation, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs).
  21. Strassler, M. (2012). Matter and energy: A false dichotomy. Retrieved from https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/mass-energy-matter-etc/matter-and-energy-a-false-dichotomy/.
  22. Wang, H. (2023). How to deal with virtual property crime: Judicial dilemma and a theoretical solution from China. Computer Law & Security Review, 49, article number 105808. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105808.