VinFunPark
VinFunPark
ISSN 2617-4162 e-ISSN 2617-4170

Social and Legal Studios

Current

Social and Legal Studios

Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026

Social and Legal Studios

ISSN 2617-4162

e-ISSN 2617-4170

Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Received 03.09.2025, Revised 01.12.2025, Accepted 29.12.2025
Article

Forced surrogacy as a background phenomenon of human trafficking


Abstract

The article examined forced surrogacy as a latent manifestation of human trafficking, which poses a threat to the democratic and legal foundations of society, especially in the context of armed conflicts, which makes the study relevant. The aim of the work was to clarify the legal nature, causes and consequences of forced surrogacy as a form of exploitation and to develop ethical and legal guidelines to prevent this phenomenon. The methodology was based on the application of formal-legal, comparative-legal, problem-oriented, systemic-structural, logical-legal methods and the method of generalisation, which allowed for a comprehensive analysis of normative acts, approaches of different countries and key contradictions in the field of reproductive practices. The study found that forced surrogacy, despite its formal similarity to legal medical services, actually contains signs of exploitation and can be classified as a form of human trafficking under international law. It has been shown that socio-economic instability, imperfect regulation and the lack of effective control over the activities of medical and intermediary structures create a breeding ground for abuse, commercial coercion and violations of women’s rights. International documents and Ukrainian legislation have been analysed, revealing gaps in regulation, including the absence of a clear legal definition, uniform standards for the protection of women and effective mechanisms for state control. Ethical and legal guidelines are proposed to minimise the risks of exploitation by strengthening guarantees of dignity and equality and enhancing international cooperation in combating human trafficking. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the possibility of using the recommendations formulated to improve national and international policies in the field of reproductive technologies and the protection of women’s rights


Keywords: exploitation; human rights; victim; violation of women’s rights; violence; coercion


Suggested citation

Savaida, O., & Tsmots, U. (2025). Forced surrogacy as a background phenomenon of human trafficking. Social and Legal Studios, 8(4), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2025.09
References
  1. Abdullah, F.M. (2019). Legal and ethical aspects beyond commercial surrogacy: Modern form of human traffickingJournal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory, 22(1S).
  2. American University Washington College of Law. (2022). ICC decision in Prosecutor v. Ongwen advances recognition of forced pregnancy as war crimes. Retrieved from https://www.american.edu/wcl/impact/initiatives-programs/international/icc-decision-in-prosecutor-v-ongwen-advances-recognition-of-forced-pregnancy-as-war-crimes.cfm.
  3. Andala, L. (2023). On an ethical foundation? The case for regulation of surrogacy in KenyaEast African Law Journal, 1(1), 210-234
  4. Andrushko, A.V. (2021). Criminological characteristics of persons who committed human trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitationKyiv Law Journal, 4, 238-243.
  5. Asirvatham, P. (2017). Can coercion be justified when it benefits the poor? The case of commercial surrogacy industry in India. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics, 8(3), article number 9. doi: 10.3329/bioethics.v8i3.35574.
  6. Atreya, A., & Kanchan, T. (2017). The ethically challenging trade of forced surrogacy in Nepal International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 140(2), 254-255. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12362.
  7. Attawet, J., Alsharaydeh, E., & Brady, M. (2024). Commercial surrogacy: Landscapes of empowerment or oppression explored through integrative review. Health Care Women International, 22, 1081-1099. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2024.2303520.
  8. BBC News. (2014). India’s surrogate mothers face hard choices. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-28679020.
  9. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. (1979, December). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-elimination-all-forms-discrimination-against-women.
  10. Children Without a State. (n.d.). International surrogacy arrangements and statelessness. Retrieved from https://www.children.worldsstateless.org/3/safeguarding-against-childhood-statelessness/international-surrogacy-arrangements-and-statelessness.html.
  11. China Society for Human Rights Studies. (2025). Ethical risks and legal regulations of surrogacy. Retrieved from https://en.humanrights.cn/r/hren/files/cms/attach/2025/02/Ethical%20Risks%20and%20Legal%20Regulations%20of%20Surrogacy.pdf
  12. Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
  13. Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2005, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-15#Text.
  14. Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989, November). Retrieved from https://chr-observatories.uwazi.io/en/entity/jyh5exc6yrd/references?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20825787022&gbraid=0AAAAAo5JJmGVFG8Ii1sAgU_oK8LZ53-AT&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIv6vzsOCekQMViDYGAB2XNQQdEAAYASAAEgKnRfD_BwE.
  15. Decision of the International Criminal Court No. ICC-02/04-01/15 “Prosecutor v. Ongwen”. (2023, November). Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2023_01717.PDF.
  16. Dutch National Rapporteur. (2012). Trafficking in human beings for the purpose of the removal of organs and forced commercial surrogacy. Retrieved from https://www.dutchrapporteur.nl/documents/2012/12/04/trafficking-in-human-beings-for-the-purpose-of-the-removal-of-organs-and-forced-commercial-surrogacy.
  17. DW Global Media Forum. (2025a). Due to the war, Ukrainians are more likely to become victims of human trafficking. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/uk/dopovid-re-cerez-vijnu-ukrainci-castise-staut-zertvami-torgivli-ludmi/a-72879844.
  18. DW Global Media Forum. (2025b). OSCE: Human trafficking has increased sharply since the beginning of the war. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/uk/v-obse-zaavili-pro-rizke-zrostanna-torgivli-ludmi-z-pocatku-vijni/a-64330812.
  19. ESHRE. (2025). Commercial baby deals “result in exploitation”. Retrieved from https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/top-stories/2025/april/commercial-baby-deals-result-in-exploitation--medics.
  20. Eurojust. (2024). Surrogacy and human trafficking: European perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/publication/surrogacy-and-human-trafficking.
  21. European Network of Migrant Women and International Coalitlon for the Adolition of Surrogacy (ICAMS-ICASM). (2022). Migrant Women and reproductive exploitation in the surrogacy industryJoint investigation. Retrieved from https://www.migrantwomennetwork.org/2022/10/21/migrant-women-and-reproductive-exploitation-in-the-surrogacy-industry-joint-investigation-by-enomw-and-icasm/?utm.
  22. Family Code of Ukraine. (2003, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text.
  23. Gallagher, A. (2010). The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Gateway Surrogacy. (2024). Countries where surrogacy is illegal: A global legal overview. Retrieved from https://www.gatewaysurrogacy.org/countries-where-surrogacy-is-illegal-a-global-legal-overview.
  25. GestLife Surrogacy. (2024). Surrogacy: History, laws, and costs around the world. Retrieved from https://www.gestlifesurrogacy.com/en/blog/surrogacy-history-laws-costs.
  26. Government Act of India No. 47 “The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021”. (2021, December). Retrieved from https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/17046/1/A2021-47.pdf.
  27. Hryhorchak, D.V. (2025). Social prerequisites for the criminalization of crimes such as human trafficking in wartime. Legal Bulletin, 15(4), 122-129. doi: 10.31732/2708-339X-2025-15-A17.
  28. Humanium. (n.d.). Children’s rights and surrogacy. Retrieved from https://www.humanium.org/en/childrens-rights-and-surrogacy/.
  29. Hyder-Rahman, N. (2021). Commercial gestational surrogacy: Unravelling the threads between reproductive tourism and child trafficking. Anti-Trafficking Review, 16, 123-143. doi: 10.14197/atr.201221168.
  30. Insights Medical Tourism. (n.d.). The ethical debate surrounding surrogacy: Key arguments. Retrieved from https://www.insights.medicaltourism.com/article/the-ethical-debate-surrounding-surrogacy-key-arguments.
  31. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966, December). Retrieved from https://chr-observatories.uwazi.io/en/entity/1ydx0r8divf/toc?raw=true&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20825787022&gbraid=0AAAAAo5JJmGVFG8Ii1sAgU_oK8LZ53-AT&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIv5PDieCekQMVQgYGAB3POTFIEAAYASAAEgJR1PD_BwE.
  32. International Justice Resource Center. (2025a). Akayesu case summary (ICTR). Retrieved from https://ijrcenter.org/international-criminal-law/ictr/case-summaries/akayesu/.
  33. International Justice Resource Center. (2025b). Kunarac case summary (ICTY). Retrieved from https://ijrcenter.org/international-criminal-law/icty/case-summaries/kunarac/.
  34. Kotiswaran, P. (2017). Revisiting the law and governance of trafficking, forced lador and modern slaver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781316675809.
  35. Kozar, Y.Yu., & Saveliev, O.R. (2024). Analysis of theoretical approaches to the study of human trafficking. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 2, 76-82. doi: 10.36695/2219-5521.2.2024.14.
  36. Kyrenko, S.G., & Gumenyuk, D.Yu. (2023). Criminal liability for human trafficking. Dictum Factum, 2(14), 197-216. doi: 10.32703/2663-6352/2023-2-14-197-216.
  37. Law of Ukraine No. 3739-VI “On Combating Human Trafficking”. (2012, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3739-17#Text
  38. Nisha, Z. (2018). Negotiating “surrogate mothering” and women’s freedom. Asian Bioethical Review, 14(3), 271-285. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00205-6.
  39. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 496-p “On approval of the State Targeted Social Program of Combating Trafficking in Human Beings for the Period up to 2025”. (2023, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/496-2023-%D1%80#Text.
  40. Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine No. 24 “On Approval of Conditions and Procedure for Artificial Insemination and Embryo Implantation and Methods of Their Implementation”. (1997, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0058-97#Text.
  41. Order of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine No. 771 “On Approval of the Instruction on the Procedure for Applying Assisted Reproductive Technologies”. (2008, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/z0263-09/ed20081223.
  42. Piersanti, V., Consalvo, F., Signore, F., Del Rio, A., & Zaami, S. (2021). Surrogacy and “proctational tourism”. What is the future from an ethical and legal point of view? Medicina, 57(1), article number 47. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047
  43. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. (2000, November). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-prevent-suppress-and-punish-trafficking-persons.
  44. Rajan, S. (2017). International surrogacy arrangements and statelessness. Retrieved from https://www.children.worldsstateless.org/3/safeguarding-against-childhood-statelessness/international-surrogacy-arrangements-and-statelessness.html.
  45. Schurr, C., & Militz, E. (2018). The affective economy of transnational surrogacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1626-1645. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18769652.
  46. Times of India. (2023). Illegal IVF & surrogacy centre busted in Gurgaon, first FIR in Haryana, says CMO. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/illegal-ivf-surrogacy-centre-busted-in-gurgaon-first-fir-in-haryana-says-cmo/articleshow/122772210.cms.
  47. Trowse, P, & Cooper, D. (2018). The agony and the ecstasy: Sacrifice and pain for financial gain: Have Indian surrogate mothers been exploited by their intended parents in commercial surrogacy arrangements? Journal of Law and Medicine, 25(2), 388-407.
  48. Tsymbal, P.V., & Zavydnyak, N.V. (2024). Human trafficking: Concept, internal and external prerequisites (historical and legal aspects). European Legal Journal, 4, 64-69. doi: 36919/3041-1149(Print).4.2024.64-69.
  49. Ukrinform. (2021). Trafficking in newborns: Police expose scheme involving sham marriage, surrogacy services. Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-crime/3299056-trafficking-in-newborns-police-expose-scheme-involving-sham-marriage-surrogacy-services.html.
  50. UNICEF, & International Social Service (ISS). (2021). Verona principles for the protection of the rights of the child born through surrogacy. Retrieved from https://www.iss-ssi.org/index.php/en/news1/605-verona-principles-launched.
  51. Wilkinson, S. (2015). Exploitation in international paid surrogacy arrangements. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 117-221. doi: 10.1111/japp.12138.