Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve mechanisms for the legal protection of property rights in the context of Ukraine's integration into the European legal space and against the backdrop of problems in distinguishing between civil and criminal law remedies. The aim was to identify the intersection of civil and criminal law in the sphere of property rights protection, identify contradictions in law enforcement, and determine areas of convergence in legal approaches. The study used logical-legal, comparative-legal and dogmatic methods, which made it possible to analyse the norms of Ukrainian legislation, decisions of national and international courts and law enforcement practice. The study examined the peculiarities of the implementation of the principle of inviolability of property rights in civil and criminal proceedings and analysed the problems of seizure of property of persons who do not have the procedural status of a suspect or accused. It was established that the current version of the procedural legislation of Ukraine does not ensure an adequate balance of interests of the parties in the case of seizure of property, which leads to a violation of the rights of civil defendants. The peculiarities of the differentiation of coercion in civil and criminal law were identified, and the functions of seizure of property as a means of securing a claim and as a procedural instrument in criminal proceedings were distinguished. The experience of Romania and North Macedonia in protecting property rights in the context of legal convergence was analysed. A conclusion was made about the advisability of adapting certain foreign practices to the Ukrainian context, in particular regarding changes to the procedures for imposing seizure of property and strengthening procedural guarantees. The practical value of the work lies in the fact that its results can be used by judges, lawyers, legislators and law enforcement officials to improve approaches to the protection of property rights and bring national law enforcement practice into line with European standards
Keywords: property rights; civil law; criminal law; protection; coercion; convergence
Suggested citation
[1] Alkema, V., Hryhoruk, P., Skhidnytska, H., & Sylkin, O. (2024). Resilience and strategic management: Ways to ensure economic and social security of Ukrainian enterprises during long-term warfare. Clio. Journal of History, Human Sciences and Critical Thought, 9, 740-767. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14567108.
[2] Bani-Meqdad, M.A.M., Senyk, P., Udod, M., Pylypenko, T., & Sylkin, O. (2024). Cyber-environment in the human rights system: Modern challenges to protect intellectual property law and ensure sustainable development of the region. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(4), 1389-1396. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.190416.
[3] Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/435-15.
[4] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution.
[5] Criminal Code of the North Macedonia. (1996, November). Retrieved from https://www.vertic.org/media/National%20 Legislation/Macedonia_FYR/MK_Criminal%20Code_2009.pdf.
[6] Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/2341-14.
[7] Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2001, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/2341-14.
[8] Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2012, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/4651-17.
[9] Crisu-Ciocinta, A. (2015). The legal protection of the property right. SEA – Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, 7, 27-32.
[10] De Graaf, T. (2019). The qualification of bitcoins as documentary intangibles. European Review of Private Law, 27(5), 1051- 1073. doi: 10.54648/ERPL2019057.
[11] Dudnyk, R. (2016). Branch differentiation of Ukrainian law: Concept, levels and trends of dev development. (PhD dissertation, Odesa Law Academy, Odesa, Ukraine).
[12] Dzyanyy, R., Kryshtanovych, M., Kiblyk, D., Kovalskyi, M., Primush, R., & Nazarenko, T. (2024). Formation of drivers of sustainable development: Administrative and legal support to ensure information security. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(4), 1611-1619. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.19043.
[13] Hnativ, O. (2014). Protection of property rights in civil law. (PhD dissertation, Ivan Franko Lviv National University, Lviv, Ukraine).
[14] International Property Rights Index. (2018). Retrieved from https://internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/.
[15] Kačerauskas, T. (2012). Creative economy and technologies: Social, legal and communicative issues. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(1), 71-80. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2011.620151.
[16] Kryshtanovych, M., Lapychak, N., Bundz, R., Drymalovska, K., Bohashko, O., & Herzanych, V. (2024). Administrative and legal guidelines for standardisation of financial reporting of enterprises as socio-economic systems. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(57), 495-504. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.4.57.2024.4472.
[17] Kucher, V.O. (2017). Inviolability of property rights under the civil legislation of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Lviv University of Trade and Economics. Legal Sciences, 4, 277-286.
[18] Law of North Macedonia “On Ownership and Other Real Rights”. (2001, February). Retrieved from https://www.libertas- institut.com/de/MK/nationallaws/law_on_ownership_and_other_real_rights.pdf.
[19] Lysak, O., & Poshyvanyuk, T. (2024). Restrictions on property rights in criminal proceedings. Equity. Retrieved from https:// equity.law/en/press-center/publications/1064.html.
[20] Mach, Ł. (2019). Measuring and assessing the impact of the global economic crisis on European real property market. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(6), 1189-1209. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2019.11234.
[21] Matiyko, M.V. (2016). Civil legal relations regarding the protection of property rights. Journal of Civil Jurisprudence, 20, 39-42.
[22] McCluskey, W., & Plimmer, F. (2011). The creation of fiscal space for the property tax: The case of Central and Eastern Europe.
International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 15(2), 123-138. doi: 10.3846/1648715X.2011.582748.
[23] Murat, S. (2021). Protection of property rights in international law. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, 4, 4-13.
[24] Nash, J. (2009). Packaging property: The effect of paradigmatic framing of property rights. Tulane Law Review, 84(3), article number 691.
[25] Naz, F., Kumar, A., Upadhyay, A., Chokshi, H., Trinkūnas, V., & Magda, R. (2022). Property management enabled by artificial intelligence post Covid-19: An exploratory review and future propositions. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 26(2), 156-171. doi: 10.3846/ijspm.2022.16923.
[26] Skarbachuk, O. (2021). Attachment of property as a measure to secure a civil claim in criminal proceedings. In Round table “Current Problems of criminal law and process” (pp. 21-23). Ostroh: The National University of Ostroh academy.
[27] Sokha, S. (2019). Problems of property rights protection in criminal proceedings. Young Scientist, 12(76), 83-86.
[28] Stoianov, M., Fedorov, I., Volosko, I., Gurtieva, L., & Pavlyshyn, A. (2023). The protection of property rights in criminal and civil proceedings: ECtHR practice. Amazonia Investiga, 12(64), 83-93. doi: 10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.8.
[29] van Erp, S., & Zimmermann, K. (2024). Research handbook on European property law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[30] Vasyliev, S.V. (2024). Legal convergence of procedural law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Alerta.
[31] Zendeli, E. (2019). Methods pf protection of the property right in the legal system of Republic of North Macedonia. SEEU Review, 14(2), 135-149. doi: 10.2478/seeur-2019-0024.
[32] Zimmermann, K. (2022). Whatʼs new in European Property Law?: An overview of publications in 2019-2021. European Property Law Journal, 11(1-2), 105-128. doi: 10.1515/eplj-2022-0004.