Social and Legal Studios
ISSN 2617-4162
e-ISSN 2617-4170
Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to conduct a critical analysis of the practice of post-penitentiary probation in Kazakhstan. Terminological, hermeneutic, and comparative methods were employed. The study explored the essence of probation, identified its main types, and examined post-penitentiary probation as an integral component in greater detail. The experiences of Norway and Sweden in this area were analysed, and it was established that these states effectively implement penitentiary probation through a combination of measures: guaranteeing humane treatment, adhering to the principle of normalisation, implementing individual supervision, facilitating the reintegration of released convicts, and reducing recidivism. The importance of incorporating these measures into the Kazakhstani system as prospects for development was emphasised. As a result, a comparative analysis of Kazakhstanʼs national legal acts and the international framework regulating penitentiary probation was conducted. Specifically, the following aspects were compared: the rights of persons released from prison; the definition of probation; the main principles and types of probation; means of rehabilitation and resocialisation; and the application of post-penitentiary probation. Additionally, statistics on the crime and security indices in Kazakhstan, Norway, and Sweden were analysed. It was found that Norway had the most favourable indicators, with a crime rate of 32.6 and a security index of 67.4; Kazakhstan occupied a middle position with scores of 45.9 and 54.1, respectively; while Sweden recorded a higher crime rate of 48.4 and a security index of 51.6. The state of post-penitentiary probation provision in Kazakhstan was investigated, and its main problems were identified: high recidivism; insufficient supervision of former convicts; lack of financial resources; limited social and legal assistance; discrimination based on criminal records; low levels of inter-agency cooperation; and a shortage of qualified personnel. The findings of this study may be useful in identifying ways to address these issues in Kazakhstan
Keywords: probation; imprisonment; correctional institution; released convicted persons; regulatory legal act
Suggested citation
[1] Adilbekova, A. (2021). The concept of probation and the implementation of probation control over persons with a suspended sentence in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Penitentiary Journal, 3(1), 26-30.
[2] Anuarbek, Ye., & Zharkenova, T. (2020). An assessment of the rehabilitation of convicts in Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://nur.nu.edu.kz/server/api/core/bitstreams/f6279832-db9d-452e-8856-f001076de68c/content.
[3] Azhibaev, M. (2020). Reformation issues of the penal system in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Penitentiary Journal, 2(3), 168-175. doi: 10.33463/2712-7737.2020.02(1-3).3.168-175.
[4] Bäckström, P.J., Danielsson, M., Starfelt Sutton, L.C., & Andersson, D. (2022). Evaluation of the predictive validity of a risk- need-responsivity assessment tool (RNR-A) in the Swedish prison and probation service. Prison Journal, 102(3), 367-390. doi: 10.1177/00328855221095561.
[5] Becker‐Pestka, D. (2022). E-learning for prisoners. experiences from Sweden, Norway, Poland, Finland and Germany. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 8(1).
[6] Berghuis, M., Nieuwbeerta, P., Palmen, H., Sentse, M., van Hazebroek, B., & van Ginneken, E. (2022). Visitation patterns and post-release offending: Exploring variations in the timing, rate, and consistency of prison visits. Journal of Criminal Justice, 81, article number 101904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101904.
[7] Bonta, J. (2023). Training community supervision officers in the risk-need-responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: A review and implications. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 62(1), 39-58. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2158986.
[8] Brooker, C., Sirdifield, C., & Marples, R. (2020). Mental health and probation: A systematic review of the literature. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 1, article number 100003. doi: 10.1016/j.fsiml.2019.100003.
[9] Chasciar, D.R., Chasciar, V., Coman, C., Toderici, O.F., Toader, L., Kovacs, A., & Bularca, M.C. (2025). Determinants of post- penitentiary social reintegration: Analysis of the needs and perceptions of persons released from detention in Romania. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, article number 1484889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1484889.
[10] Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1995, August). Retrieved from https://www.akorda.kz/en/constitution-of-the-republic-of-kazakhstan-50912.
[11] Corley, F. (2022). Kazakhstan: Post-prison “Thereʼs a block everywhere!”. Retrieved from https://www.eurasiareview.com/23052022-kazakhstan-post-prison-theres-a-block-everywhere/.
[12] Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014, July). Retrieved from https://track.unodc.org/uploads/documents/BRI-legal-resources/Kazakhstan/16_-_Criminal_Procedure_Code_of_the_Republic_of_Kazakhstan_EN.pdf.
[13] Dhami, M.K., & van den Brink, Y.N. (2022). A multi-disciplinary and comparative approach to evaluating pre-trial detention decisions: Towards evidence-based reform. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28, 381-395. doi: 10.1007/ s10610-022-09510-0.
[14] Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2016/343 “On the Strengthening of Certain Aspects of the Presumption of Innocence and of the Right to Be Present at the Trial in Criminal Proceedings”. (2016, March). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/343/oj/eng.
[15] Dominey, J., & Canton, R. (2022). Probation and the ethics of care. Probation Journal, 69(4), 417-433. doi: 10.1177/02645505221105401.
[16] Isibayeva, E.I. (2024). The impact of the probation service on the socialization of persons released from prison. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 1(76), 164-173. doi: 10.52026/2788- 5291_2024_76_1_164.
[17] Jasiński, K. (2024). Fear of freedom in the context of social re-adaptation of repeat offenders. In I. Visković, Z. Zacłona & I. Radovanović (Eds.), Pedagogy in education practice (pp. 218-237). Split: University of Split.
[18] Jiang, S., Zhang, D., & Lambert, E.G. (2022). Views of community corrections supervision and their predictors: An officer and offender comparison. Prison Journal, 102(1), 84-107. doi: 10.1177/00328855211069305.
[19] Khablo, O., & Svoboda, I. (2024). International standards for the application of the presumption of innocence in criminal proceedings. 3cientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 29(1), 55-65. doi: 10.56215/naia-herald/1.2024.55.
[20] Koffeld-Hamidane, S., Andvig, E., & Karlsson, B. (2023). Spotlighting the probation meeting – Lived experiences of desistance-supporting interaction following imprisonment. European Journal of Probation, 15(3), 218-237. doi: 10.1177/20662203231199397.
[21] Kuć, M. (2021). The role of post-penitentiary assistance in counteracting the social stigmatisation and marginalisation of former convicts released from penitentiary facilities. Biuletyn 3towarzyszenia Absolwentów i Przyjaciół Wydziału Prawa Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, 16(1), 149-164. doi: 10.32084/sawp.2021.16.1-9.
[22] Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 38-IV LRK “On Probation”. (2016, December). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/docs/Z1600000038.
[23] Lerman, A.E., Sadin, M., Morrison, W., & Wieselthier, J. (2024). The effects of post-release community supervision reform. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20, 23-48. doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09524-y.
[24] Mertl, J. (2022). What seems to be the problem? Ex-prisonersʼ reentry/resettlement in the Czech Republic. Crime & Delinquency, 70(8), 1993-2016. doi: 10.1177/00111287221115645.
[25] Moroz, I., & Horislavska, I. (2024). The legal and penitentiary system as repressive apparatus: Legal methods of protecting a civil and political rights. Law. Human. Environment, 15(2), 85-100. doi: 10.31548/law/2.2024.85.
[26] Mukasheva, D., Kudabekov, M., Yessimova, D., Tulkinbayev, N., & Konvisar, A. (2023). Resocialisation programmes in Kazakhstan. In U. Pape, H. Stöver & I.I. Michels (Eds.), Social work and health in prisons (pp. 189-219). Madrid: Nomos. doi: 10.5771/9783748935988-189.
[27] Mukasheva, D., Tulkinbayev, N., Prilutskaya, M., Yessimova, D., & Stöver, H. (2024). Behind bars: Understanding prisoner perception of penitentiary rehabilitation in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77, article number 100669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100669.
[28] Nesterov, A.Y. (2020). Features and problems of post-prison adaptation of juvenile convicts: Methods and ways to overcome them. Bulletin the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(386), 251-264. doi: 10.32014/2020.2518- 1467.126.
[29] Priestley, P., & Vanstone, M. (2022). Looking back – Looking forward. In M. Vanstone & P. Priestley (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global rehabilitation in criminal justice (pp. 687-699). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14375- 5_39.
[30] Probation Explained: Everything You Need to Know. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.jedplatform.com/2024/07/24/ define-probation/.
[31] Pylypenko, L., & Zmysna, I. (2023). Essence, classification and functions of social services in Ukraine. Democratic Governance, 16(1), 118-128. doi: 10.23939/dg2023.01.118.
[32] Rakhimberdin, K.K. (2024). The institution of arrest as a punishment in the legislation of the republic of Kazakhstan: Collisions, problems, and application prospects. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(79), 118-126. doi: 10.52026/2788-5291_2024_79_4_118.
[33] Rakhimova, G., Izbassova, A., Dyussebayev, T., & Baisymakova, D. (2024). Problems of efficiency of the system of execution of punishments in the criminal law of Kazakhstan: between legislation and the experience of repeat offenders. Social and Legal Studios, 7(4), 59-68. doi: 10.32518/sals4.2024.59.
[34] Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers No. CM/Rec(2010)1 “To Member States on the Council of Europe Probation Rules”. (2010, January). Retrieved from https://surl.li/dyapzp.
[35] Ruhland, E., & Scheibler, E. (2021). Probation officer discretion in monitoring and violating supervision conditions. Probation Journal, 69(2), 177-196. doi: 10.1177/02645505211041578.
[36] Sandbukt, I.J. (2021). Reentry in practice: Sexual offending, self-narratives, and the implications of stigma in Norway. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(9), 930-951. doi: 10.1177/0306624x211049184.
[37] Schaefer, L., Moir, E., & Williams, G.C. (2022). When a loved one is on community supervision: The crime controller strategies used by “PoPPs” (parents/partners/peers of probationers and parolees). In B. Stickle (Ed.), Field studies in environmental criminology (pp. 81-98). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003240280.
[38] Spytska, L. (2024). Symptoms and main features of personality formation of a psychopath. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 26(1), 34-43. doi: 10.12740/APP/172226.
[39] Stanek, K.M., Grzegolec, N., & Mikuli, I. (2021). Social and professional readaptation programs in the world as a good example of
practices in the field of post-penitentiary aid in Poland. Probacja, 2, 53-72. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.9326.
[40] Suonpää, K., Aaltonen, M., Tyni, S., Ellonen, N., & Kivivuori, J. (2023). Post-release outcomes of lethal and non-lethal offenders: Recidivism and participation in employment or education. Journal of Criminal Justice, 88, article number 102108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102108.
[41] Sutton, L.C., Persson, B.N., & Danielsson, M. (2023). Predicting intimate partner violence recidivism using the Swedish prison and probation serviceʼs risk-need-responsivity assessment (RNR-A). Nordic Journal of Criminology, 24(1). doi: 10.18261/ njc.24.1.4.
[42] Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. (n.d.). Statistics from the judicial system. Retrieved from https://bra.se/english/statistics/statistics-from-the-judicial-system#h-Recidivism.
[43] Tleubayev, A, Taubayev, B, Aitimov, B, & Tinistanova, S. (2024). Leading practices of development of probation service. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. 3eries “Physics”, 55, 2361-2371. doi: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.236ki1.
[44] Todd-Kvam, J. (2020). Probation practice, desistance and the penal field in Norway. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 22(3), 349-
366. doi: 10.1177/1748895820953192.
[45] Toedtman, S.T. (2024). Exploring the exceptional corrections paradigm: An analytical case-study of the Norwegian model of criminal justice. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10037/34106.
[46] United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. (1997). Promoting probation internationally. Retrieved from https://unicri.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/Probation_international.pdf.
[47] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). The EU, the UN and the Netherlands support social reintegration of prisoners in Kazakhstan: Visit to Karagandy region. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/roca/en/news/the-eu--the-un-and-the- netherlands-support-social-reintegration-of-prisoners-in-kazakhstan_-visit-to-karagandy-region.html.
[48] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). Fostering regional collaboration on probation: The study visit of Kyrgyzstanʼs and Tajikistanʼs delegations to Kazakhstan. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/roca/en/NEWS/news_2024/july/fostering-regional-collaboration-on-probation_-the-study-visit-of-kyrgyzstans-and-tajikistans-delegations-to-kazakhstan.html.
[49] United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules). (1990, December). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-standard-minimum-rules-non-custodial- measures.
[50] Verweij, S., Beijersbergen, K.A., Weijters, G., Wermink, H.T., & Blokland, A.A. (2024). Supervision following release from prison and reoffending during and after the supervision period. Crime & Delinquency. doi: 10.1177/00111287241277767.
[51] Weswasi, E.A. (2025). Effect of early prison release with electronic monitoring. Journal of Criminal Justice, 97, article number 102379. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102379.
[52] Weswasi, E.A., Sivertsson, F., Bäckman, O., & Nilsson, A. (2023). Does sentence length affect the risk for criminal recidivism? A quasi-experimental study of three policy reforms in Sweden. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19, 971-999. doi: 10.1007/ s11292-022-09513-1.
[53] World Population Review. (2025). Crime rate by country 2025. Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/crime-rate-by-country.
[54] Youssef, C. (2023). Prison to desistance: (re)integration and aftercare for those released from prison. Journal of Forensic Practice, 25(4), 356-374. doi: 10.1108/JFP-04-2023-0013.
[55] Yu, R., Långström, N., Forsman, M., Sjölander, A., Fazel, S., & Molero, Ya. (2022). Associations between prisons and recidivism: A nationwide longitudinal study. PloS One, 17(5), article number e0267941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267941.
[56] Zhunisbayeva, G., Zabikh, Sh., Chokina, M., Ryssaldiyeva, A., Osmanova, G., & Zayed, N.M. (2021). Problems of re-socialization of citizens released from the places of deprivation of liberty. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(6).