Social and Legal Studios
ISSN 2617-4162
e-ISSN 2617-4170
Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyse Ukraine’s practices in implementing the doctrine of administrative services, which became the basis for a new model of interaction between the state and citizens. The study focused on the conceptual and practical aspects of the integration of administrative services at the level of territorial communities, with an emphasis on the role of decentralisation, which ensures great accessibility and quality of administrative services through the flexibility and efficiency of local self-government. The methodology of the study was based on the analysis of regulations, the study of successful practices of administrative service centres (ASCs), as well as a comparative approach, which helped to identify the advantages and challenges of the Ukrainian model in the context of international practices. The findings of the study demonstrated the success of integrated service delivery offices in communities. Integrated offices, specifically ASCs, provide quick access to basic services, while decentralisation has contributed to effective resource management at the state and local levels, enabling better adaptation of services to the needs of residents. The digitalisation of services improved service efficiency by minimising bureaucratic obstacles and reducing time spent. However, one of the key challenges is the uneven access to digital services, especially in rural communities and for the elderly. Furthermore, a lack of funding and overly centralised norms and standards create obstacles for local governments, limiting their autonomy and ability to respond quickly to community demands. At the same time, some aspects of outsourcing and competition are highly controversial due to the risks of commercialisation of public services. The findings of the study showed that Ukraine’s practices in reforming the administrative services sector contribute to the Europeanisation and humanisation of public administration and administrative law, strengthening its citizen-orientation. Certain aspects of these practices may be of interest to other countries
Keywords: integrated offices; administrative service centres; decentralisation; digitalisation; outsourcing
Suggested citation
[1] Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Murko, E. (2024). Decoding the digital landscape: An empirically validated model for assessing digitalisation across public administration levels. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), article number 41. doi: 10.3390/ admsci14030041.
[2] Borelle, C., Pharabod, A., & Peugeot, V. (2023). Digitisation of administrative procedures: A test for mediation professionals. Revue des Politiques Sociales et Familiales, 149(4), 191-206.
[3] Breyer, S.G., Stewart, R.B., Sunstein, C.R., Vermeule, A., & Herz, M. (2022). Administrative law and regulatory policy: Problems, text, and cases. Boston: Aspen Publishing.
[4] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80.
[5] Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 810/98 “On Measures to Implement the Concept of Administrative Reform in Ukraine”. (1998, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/810/98#Text.
[6] Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralisation for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), article number 1804036. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036.
[7] Doran, N.M., Puiu, S., Bădîrcea, R.M., Pirtea, M.G., Doran, M.D., Ciobanu, G., & Mihit, L.D. (2023). E-government development – a key factor in government administration effectiveness in the European Union. Electronics, 12(3), article number 641. doi: 10.3390/electronics12030641.
[8] Draft Law No. 4380 “On Administrative Fee”. (2020, November). Retrieved from https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=70434.
[9] Estrela, E. (2023). Closing the digital divide: Promoting equal access to digital technologies. Retrieved from https://pace.coe.int/en/files/31786/html.
[10] European Commission. (2023). Digital public administration factsheets. Retrieved from https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/nifo-national-interoperability-framework-observatory/digital-public-administration-factsheets-2023.
[11] European Commission. (2024a). Digital public administration factsheets. Retrieved from https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/nifo-national-interoperability-framework-observatory/digital-public-administration-factsheets-2024.
[12] European Commission. (2024b). Ukraine 2024 report. Retrieved from https://surl.gd/ltxafj.
[13] Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2022). Strategic management in public service organisations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003054917.
[14] Harashchuk, V. (2001). Management services – a new institution or a new mistake? Journal of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 26(3), 109-114.
[15] Harlow, C. (2006). Global administrative law: The quest for principles and values. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 187-214. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi158.
[16] Jeong, M.-J., Rheem, S.-M., Park, Y.-H., Nurtazina, R., & Tkach, M. (2024). Loss and damage of Ukraine’s cultural heritage: Actions of the Russian Federation today compared to Germany during World War II. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 81(1), 84-92. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2024.2314850.
[17] Khadzhyradieva, S., Slukhai, S., & Rachynskyi, A. (2020). Public administration in Ukraine: adjusting to European standards. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(1), 81-108. doi: 10.2478/nispa-2020-0004.
[18] Koliushko, I.B., Averyanov, V.B., Tymoshchuk, V.P., Kuibida, R.O., & Holosnichenko, I.P. (2001). Administrative reform and administrative law. Kyiv: Centre of Policy and Legal Reform.
[19] Kyrychok, A., Harbuza, T., Teslenko, N., Okhrimenko, O., & Zalizniuk, V. (2024). Training civil servants in promoting the reputation of the country in the settings of crisis communication. Teaching Public Administration, 42(3), 376-399. doi: 10.1177/01447394231191928.
[20] Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461-475. doi: 10.1111/gove.12502.
[21] Law of Ukraine No. 2073-IX “On Administrative Procedure”. (2022, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2073-20#Text.
[22] Law of Ukraine No. 5203-VI “On Administrative Services”. (2012, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5203-17#Text.
[23] Leyland, P. (2025). The civil service UK style: Facing up to change? In K.-P. Sommermann, A. Krzywoń & C. Fraenkel- Haeberle (Eds.), The civil service in Europe: A research companion (pp. 320-341). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003458333.
[24] Melnyk, R.S., & Bevzenko, V.M. (2014). General administrative law. Kyiv: Vaite.
[25] Miliienko, O. (2023). Examining administrative court actions to mitigate issues of internal displacement resulting from ineffective government policies. JUS Rivista di Scienze Giuridiche, 2023(5), 223-257. doi: 10.26350/18277942_000150.
[26] Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 523-р “Certain Issues of Provision of Administrative Services by Executive Authorities through Administrative Service Centres”. (2014, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/523-2014-%D1%80/ed20140516#Text.
[27] Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 90 “On Approval of the Concept of Development of the System of Administrative Services Provision by Executive Authorities”. (2006, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/90-2006-%D1%80#Text.
[28] Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 969 “On Amendments to the Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 523 of 16 May 2014”. (2021, August). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/969-2021-%D1%80#n8.
[29] Peña-Casas, R., & Ghailani, D. (2023). The impact of digitalisation on job quality in the electricity, hospital and public administrations sectors in eight EU countries. Retrieved from https://www.ose.be/digiqualpub/files/deliverables/2023_digiqualpub_ Deliverable3.2_Digitalisation&JobQuality.pdf.
[30] Pluzhnyk, O., Berezanska, I., & Kotsur, D. (2024). Using information systems to automate the document processing process. Society. Document. Communication, 9(3), 56-64. doi: 10.69587/sdc/3.2024.56.
[31] Ponti, B., Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A., & Di Mascio, F. (2022). Transparency, digitalisation and corruption. In E. Carloni & M. Gnaldi (Eds.), Understanding and fighting corruption in Europe: From repression to prevention (pp. 97-126). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82495-2_6.
[32] Public Administration Reform Strategy for 2022-2025. (2021). Retrieved from https://par.in.ua/contents/onovlennia-statehii-reformuvannia-derzhavnoho-upravlinnia-do-2025-roku.
[33] Randall, L., Berlina, A., Teräs, J., & Rinne, T. (2018). Digitalisation as a tool for sustainable Nordic regional development. Retrieved from https://www.nordregio.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Digitalisation_Discussion-Paper_Jan-31.pdf.
[34] Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 737 “On Measures to Streamline Administrative Services”. (2009, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/737-2009-%D0%BF#Text.
[35] Ryzhuk, I., Bryhinets, О., & Halus, О. (2021). Anti-corruption policy in the field of public management of the social sector in the context of decentralization. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 11(1), 47-54. doi: 10.33270/04212101.47.
[36] Shepherd, R.P., & Champagne, E. (2024). Delivering results for Canadians: Improving the contributions of enabling functions. Canadian Public Administration, 67(4), 585-597. doi: 10.1111/capa.12600.
[37] SIGMA. (2023). Public administration in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/Monitoring-Report-2023-Ukraine.pdf.
[38] Smith, B.C. (2023). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003404927.
[39] Tymoshchuk, V. (2024). Ukraine’s new law on administrative procedure: Progress towards EU standards and implications for tax and customs. Lex Portus, 10(5), 16-27. doi: 10.62821/lp10502.
[40] U-Lead. (2021). Results of monitoring of 25 pilot ASCs of the U-LEAD with Europe Programme’s Inception Phase. Retrieved from https://tsnap.ulead.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Zvit_Monitoryng-2018-2019_2020_TSNAP-Pochatkovoyi-Fazy_25.03.2021.pdf.
[41] Uliutina, O. (2023). Information and communication technologies legislation for self-government bodies. Law. Human. Environment, 14(4), 66-78. doi: 10.31548/law/4.2023.66.
[42] Uzun, Y., & Koch, S. (2020). Decentralisation vs centralisation: Scenarios of regional development of Ukraine in the context of internal stability establishment. Strategic Review, 13, 243-262. doi: 10.14746/ps.2020.1.15.
[43] Warren, K.F. (2018). Administrative law in the political system. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429502552.
[44] Zayats, D. (2024). Decentralisation reform in Ukraine: Achievements and implementation prospects amidst war conditions. Democratic Governance, 17(2), 5-17. doi: 10.56318/dg/2.2024.05.
[45] Zubko, O., Levchenko, D., Sokiran, M., Danylenko, A., & Zubko, A. (2023). Philosophical and legal interpretations of modern theory of public administration in Ukraine. Amazon Investiga, 12(72), 59-68. doi: 10.34069/AI/2023.72.12.5.