Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the inconsistency of the national legislation of Ukraine on bankruptcy with the current conditions on the territory of the state, which are connected with the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation. Martial law causes high risks of destruction of medium, small and large business enterprises, in particular in uncontrolled and temporarily occupied territories. Thus, the purpose of the study is to justify the need to improve the national legislation on bankruptcy, increase the efficiency of the mechanisms for the realization of rights, the fulfilment of obligations and the protection of the interests of economic entities in the conditions of military confrontation. The main methods used to write the work: historical, comparative, statistical, method of analysis, synthesis. The results of this work turned out to be the following: the legislation regulating legal relations regarding bankruptcy was investigated, it was found out which subjects of economic activity are at risk of bankruptcy, and the impact of the war on the state of legal regulation of the economic sphere was investigated. A conclusion was made regarding the main shortcomings of the national bankruptcy legislation. The question of the possibility of preserving the debtor’s further reputation and the proportional satisfaction of creditors’ rights by following the bankruptcy procedure, which was developed in accordance with modern conditions, was also investigated. The possibility of compensation for losses from the side of the aggressor country for those enterprises that suffered losses and destruction as a result of Russian military aggression is also indicated. The expediency of introducing a moratorium on bankruptcy and the main disadvantages of this type of restriction are discussed. Further directions for improving and increasing the level of effectiveness of the legally provided mechanisms for the implementation of the bankruptcy procedure in the conditions of war on the territory of Ukraine are proposed. The results of research work can be used as a theoretical basis for further legislative developments in the field of bankruptcy.
Keywords: martial law; bankruptcy procedure; legal relations; economic sanctions; business entities
Suggested citation
[1] Acosta-Ormaechea, S., & Morozumi, A. (2022). Bankruptcy costs, idiosyncratic risk, and long-run growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 27(7), 1807-1842. doi: 10.1017/S1365100522000475.
[2] Calu, M. (2022). Steps towards harmonizing and improving consumer insolvency rules in the European Union. LESIJ – Lex ET Scientia International Journal, XXIX(2), 7-18.
[3] Cassation Commercial Court. (2023). Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pro_sud/og_pov.
[4] Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures. (2018, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/2597-19#Text.
[5] Dobre, I.C. (2022). State aid granted by the European Union for the recovery of the HORECA sector. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 22(1), 55-60.
[6] Draft Law No. 4409 “On Amendments to the Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures”. (2020, November). Retrieved from https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=70493.
[7] Draft Law No. 5010 “On Amendments to the ‘Final and Transitional Provisions’ Section of the Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures on Prevention of Negative Economic Consequences of Unscrupulous Bankruptcy of Enterprises as a Result of Military Aggression in the East of Ukraine”. (2021, February). Retrieved from https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=70996.
[8] Draft Law No. 7442 “On Amendments to the Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures on the Application of Bankruptcy Procedures During Martial Law”. (2022, June). Retrieved from https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=74341.
[9] Draft Law No. 8231 “On Amendments to the Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures on Prevention of Abuses in the Field of Bankruptcy for the Period of Martial Law”. (2022, November). Retrieved from http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=75246.
[10] European Union. (2019, June). Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (Directive on restructuring and insolvency). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1023/oj.
[11] Fauzia, A., Octavia, D.G.R., & Hamdani, F. (2022). The conflict of the norms in the execution of secured objects which are enforced by liability rights when the debtor is bankrupt. Progressive Law Review, 4(1), 1-9. doi: 10.36448/plr.v4i01.67.
[12] Fir, N. (2022). Does debt have threshold effects on medium-term growth? Evidence from European Union countries. Our Economy, 68(2), 1-18. doi: 10.2478/ngoe-2022-0007.
[13] Gurrea-Martínez, A. (2020). The future of reorganization procedures in the era of pre-insolvency law. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 829-854. doi: 10.1007/s40804-020-00191-y.
[14] Katsanidou, A., Reinl, A.-K., & Eder, C. (2022). Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises. European Union Politics, 23(1), 66-78. doi: 10.1177/14651165211035663.
[15] Kitowski, J., Kowal-Pawul, A., & Lichota, W. (2022). Identifying symptoms of bankruptcy risk based on bankruptcy prediction models – a case study of Poland. Sustainability, 14(3), article number 1416. doi: 10.3390/su14031416.
[16] Kulyk, O.M. (2022). Analysis of bankruptcy determination models for enterprises in the hospitality industry. In Problems and prospects of implementation and implementation of interdisciplinary scientific achievements: Materials of the IV international scientific conference (pp. 13-14). Vinnytsia: European Scientific Platform.
[17] Le, T. (2022). A comprehensive survey of unbalanced learning methods for bankruptcy prediction. IET Communications, 16(5), 433-441. doi: 10.1049/cmu2.12268.
[18] Papíková, L., & Papík, M. (2022). Effects of classification, feature selection, and resampling methods on bankruptcy prediction of small and medium‐sized enterprises. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 29(4), 254-281. doi: 10.1002/isaf.1521.
[19] Radovanovic, J., & Haas, C. (2023). The evaluation of bankruptcy prediction models based on socio-economic costs. Expert Systems with Applications, 227, article number 120275. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120275.
[20] Samoilenko, H.V. (2021). Legal regulation of the institute of bankruptcy under the conditions of the marital state. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 5, 345-348. doi: 10.32782/25240374/20215/81.
[21] Shvidka, T.I. (2022). Features of the reform of bankruptcy legislation during the period of marital state. Analytical and Comparative Legal Science, 1, 229-234. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.35.
[22] Sodoma, R.I. (2022). Anti-crisis management with the probability of bankruptcy. In Thesis of the III international scientific and practical Internet conference of the Kyiv National University of Technology and Design (pp. 57-60). Kyiv: Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design.
[23] Stamolampros, P., & Symitsi, E. (2022). Employee treatment, financial leverage, and bankruptcy risk: Evidence from high contact services. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 105, article number 103268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103268.
[24] Staschuk, O., Shostak, L., & Bulyk, D. (2022). Bankruptcy of enterprises under the conditions of marital state. Economy and Society, 44. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-44-29.
[25] Walter, G., Illés, F., & Tóth, F. (2022). How does the leniency of personal bankruptcy law affect entrepreneurship in EU countries? PLoS One, 17(7), article number e272025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272025.
[26] Zhang, D. (2023). Subsidy expiration and greenwashing decision: Is there a role of bankruptcy risk? Energy Economics, 118, article number 106530. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106530.