VinFunPark
VinFunPark
ISSN 2617-4162 e-ISSN 2617-4170

Social and Legal Studios

Current

Social and Legal Studios

Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026

Social and Legal Studios

ISSN 2617-4162

e-ISSN 2617-4170

Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Received 28.11.2024, Revised 02.03.2025, Accepted 26.03.2025
Article

The role of constitutional litigation in the protection of fundamental human rights: An assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic


Abstract

The study of the Constitutional Court’s effectiveness in protecting human rights in the Kyrgyz Republic is particularly relevant due to ongoing legal reforms and the increasing number of constitutional complaints. The research aimed to assess the Court’s role in safeguarding constitutional rights by analysing case trends from 2022 to 2024. The study employed formal-legal, comparative legal, historical-legal, logical-legal, and legal concretisation methods to examine judicial decisions, legal frameworks, and the interaction of the Constitutional Court with state bodies. The analysis of judicial practice revealed that while the Constitutional Court plays a crucial role in upholding constitutional principles, challenges remain in its independence, accessibility, and the enforcement of rulings. It was found that the number of human rights-related appeals has increased, yet the acceptance rate for proceedings remains low, highlighting procedural barriers to constitutional justice. The study examined key cases on gender equality, labour rights, and electoral legislation, demonstrating the Court’s influence on the legal landscape. A comparative analysis with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan revealed common regional trends, including the political factors affecting constitutional adjudication. Additionally, the research identified a need for clearer legislative frameworks and institutional reforms to strengthen the Court’s effectiveness in human rights protection. The results can be used to develop strategies for enhancing judicial independence, improving constitutional litigation procedures, and ensuring better enforcement of human rights protections within the legal system of the Kyrgyz Republic


Keywords: legal defence; judicial complaint; rule of law; legal control; fundamental rights and interests of citizens


Suggested citation

Tailakova, S., Sultambaeva, A., Shamshieva, M., Kakeshov, B., & Kanybekova, B. (2025). The role of constitutional litigation in the protection of fundamental human rights: An assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic. Social and Legal Studios, 8(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals1.2025.59
References

[1] Ahmad, Wantu, F.M., & Ismail, D.E. (2022). Constitutional dialogue in judicial review at the Indonesian constitutional court: The future prospectsJournal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(1).

[2] Akisheva, A. (2023). Women’s rights in the constitutional framework of Kyrgyzstan. In I. Spigno, V.R. Scotti & J.L. Penalva da Silva (Eds.), The rights of women in comparative constitutional law (pp. 227-246). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003349488-17.

[3] Annual report of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2022). Retrieved from https://constsot.kg/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/gd-2022.pdf.

[4] Apakhayev, N., Adilova, K., Bugybay, D., Toktybaev, A., & Kopbayev, D. (2024). The problem of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of the child in the family and outside it. Danube, 15(3), 221-236. doi: 10.2478/danb-2024-0013.

[5] Awawda, O. (2024). Assessment of de jure judicial independence of constitutional courts according to international guidelines. Constitutional Review, 10(1), 202-233. doi: 10.31078/consrev1017.

[6] Bellia, A.J., & Clark, B.R. (2022). The constitutional law of interpretationNotre Dame Law Review, 98(2), 519-616.

[7] Castillo-Ortiz, P. (2020). The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the case for a new design of Kelsenian Institutions. Law and Philosophy, 39(6), 617-655. doi: 10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3.

[8] Chemerinsky, E. (2023). Constitutional law. London: Aspen Publishing. Retrieved from

[9] Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2021, April). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/1-2/edition/1202952/ru.

[10] Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 133 “On the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2021, November). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/112318/edition/1282054/ru.

[11] Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 68 “On the Election of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and Deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2011, July). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/203244/edition/1273870/ru.

[12] Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 81 “On Amendments to the Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the Election of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and Deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2023, April). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/112565/edition/1244307/ru.

[13] Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2021, October). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/3-37/edition/2086/ru.

[14] Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the Case on Verification of the Constitutionality of Part 13 of Article 121 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2022, June). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/9803/edition/1179913/ru.

[15] Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the Case on Verification of Constitutionality of Part 6 of Article 28 of the Constitutional Law of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the Election of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and Deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2022, April). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/8910/edition/1195082/ru.

[16] Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the Case of Tilek kyzy Elvira and Ainura Musaevna Osmonalieva, Representing the Interests of Altyn Abtyn Kapalova interests of Kapalova Altyn Abdykadyrovna”. (2023, June). Retrieved from https://constsot.kg/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/11-tilek-k.e.-osmonalieva-a.m..pdf.

[17] Decisions of Constitutional Court can be reviewed in Kyrgyzstan. (2023). Retrieved from https://24.kg/english/276501_ Decisions_of_Constitutional_Court_can_be_reviewed_in_Kyrgyzstan/.

[18] Dube, F. (2022). Separation of powers and the institutional supremacy of the Constitutional Court over Parliament and the executive. South African Journal on Human Rights, 36(4), 293-318 doi: 10.1080/02587203.2021.1925954.

[19] Duishonbaeva, A., Atantaev, A., Sultanova, A., Aitbaev, T., Yong, K.J., Zhusupova, A., Maksymova, A., & Abdullaeva, Z. (2021). Constitutional development stages in Kyrgyzstan. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(10), 238-247. doi: 10.4236/jss.2021.910017.

[20] Elcaputera, A., & Satoto, S. (2023). The annulment of constitutional amendments through the judiciary: A comparative study between Kyrgyzstan and Turkey and its relevance in Indonesia. In Proceeding of the 4th green development international conference (pp. 642-652). London: Atlantis Press. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-110-4_64.

[21] Engst, B.G. (2021). The two faces of judicial power. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7.

[22] Equality Now. (2023). Kyrgyzstan – expert opinion to the Constitutional Court regarding the list of the prohibited professions for women, November 2023. Retrieved from https://equalitynow.org/resource/kyrgyzstan-expert-opinion-to-the-constitutional-court-regarding-the-list-of-the-prohibited-professions-for-women-november-2023/.

[23] Family Code of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2003, August). Retrieved from https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/kyr205216.pdf.

[24] Florczak-Wątor, M.(2020). Judicial law-makingin European constitutional courts. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003022442.

[25] Ghaleigh, N.S., Setzer, J., & Welikala, A. (2022). The complexities of comparative climate constitutionalism. Journal of Environmental Law, 34(3), 517-528. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqac008.

[26] Grabenwarter, C., Huber, P.M., Knez, R., & Ziemele, I. (2021). The role of the constitutional courts in the European judicial network. European Public Law, 27(1), 43-62. doi: 10.54648/euro2021003.

[27] Granat, M. (2022). On the experiences of a constitutional court in an illiberal democracy. Incapacitated but Necessary. In J.M. Castellà Andreu & M.A. Simonelli (Eds.), Populism and contemporary democracy in Europe: Old problems and new challenges (pp. 137-156). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-92884-1_7.

[28] Kerimkanova, Z.Z., & Bazarbaev, E.B. (2024). Ensuring sustainable development of the Kyrgyz Republic: The impact of administrative and judicial control on the construction sector. E3S Web of Conferences, 535, article number 02014. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202453502014.

[29] Kovalchuk, O., Banakh, S., Chudyk, N., & Drakokhrust, T. (2024). Machine learning models for judicial information support. Law, Policy and Security, 2(1), 33-45. doi: 10.62566/lps/1.2024.33.

[30] Kryvytskyi, Y. (2024). Judicial lawmaking and judicial reform: Theoretical and practical aspects of the relationship. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 14(3), 43-54. doi: 10.56215/naia-chasopis/3.2024.43.

[31] Labor Code of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2004, August). Retrieved from https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=6714.

[32] Lailam, T., & Chakim, M.L. (2023). A proposal to adopt concrete judicial review in Indonesian Constitutional court: A study on the German Federal Constitutional Court experiences. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 148-171. doi: 10.22304/pijh,v10n2.a1.

[33] Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 149 “On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic”. (2023, July). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/112630/edition/1267403/ru.

[34] Lenaerts, K., Van Nuffel, P., & Corthaut, T. (2021). EU constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[35] Makhambetsaliyev, D.B., Sagynbekova, G.M., Abdykadyr, U.B., Alimova, E.A., & Smanova, A.B. (2024). Constitutional law- making in the US Supreme Court. Public Integrity, 26(4), 473-484. doi: 10.1080/10999922.2023.2282261.

[36] Mazur, T., & Korolchіuk, V. (2024). Role of court precedents in the development of EU law and the legal systems of the candidate states: Examples of Ukraine and Moldova. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 29(3), 27-41. doi: 10.56215/naia-herald/3.2024.27.

[37] Nazarova, D. (2021). Vicious circle of patronalism: Constitutional court power in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Retrieved from https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/cess2022/paper/67280.

[38] Opinion of the Venice Commission No. 1021/2021 “On the Draft Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2021, March). Retrieved from https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:7686.

[39] Order of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 158. (1999, March). Retrieved from https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=566.

[40] Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2022, February). Retrieved from https://constsot.kg/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/reglament_ks_ru.pdf.

[41] Safta, M. (2022). The role of the constitutional courts in maintaining peace: Judicial public policyRevista Direito das Políticas Públicas, 4(2), 6-29.

[42] Saparbekova, E.K., Smanova, A.B., Makhambetsaliyev, D.B., Nessipbaeva, I.S., & Nussipova, L.B. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Constitutional Judicial Law-Making in the United States of America and Kazakhstan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Lawdoi: 10.1007/s11196-024-10138-y.

[43] Scholtes, J. (2021). Abusing constitutional identity. German Law Journal, 22(4), 534-556. doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.21.

[44] Serikzhanova, A., Nurtazina, R., Serikzhanova, I., Bukharbay, B., & Taitorina, B. (2024). Evolving political cultures in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan: Trends and new paradigms. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(3), 1-24. doi: 10.29333/ejecs/1914.

[45] Shubalyi, О., & Yefimov, A. (2023). Decent work as a factor of involvement of different categories of employees in EU countries. Economic Forum, 13(3), 73-81. doi: 10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-3-10.

[46] Steuer, M. (2023). Authoritarian populism, conceptions of democracy, and the Hungarian Constitutional Court: The case of political participation. International Journal of Human Rights, 26(7), 1207-1229. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1968379.

[47] Stone, G.R., Seidman, L.M., Sunstein, C.R., Tushnet, M.V., Karlan, P.S., Huq, A., & Litman, L.M. (2023). Constitutional law. London: Aspen Publishing.

[48] Wijaya, A., & Nasran, N. (2021). Comparison of judicial review: A critical approach to the model in several countriesJurnal Legalitas, 14(2), 85-106.

[49] Yunusov, K., & Leylanoğlu, H. (2024). Constitutional guarantee of the right to petition in the basic laws of the Central Asian republicsCentral Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 5(1), 102-110.