VinFunPark
VinFunPark
ISSN 2617-4162 e-ISSN 2617-4170

Social and Legal Studios

Current

Social and Legal Studios

Vol. 9, No. 1, 2026

Social and Legal Studios

ISSN 2617-4162

e-ISSN 2617-4170

Publisher: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs

Received 12.08.2024, Revised 18.11.2024, Accepted 23.12.2024
Article

Legal regulation of social entrepreneurship focused on the integration of marginalised groups into society


Abstract

The study aimed to compare legal approaches to support social entrepreneurship aimed at the integration of marginalised groups into society in several countries, including France, Italy, Great Britain, the United States of America and South Korea. The results demonstrated unique models of legislative support focused on social inclusion: from the social and solidarity economy model in France to public interest companies in Great Britain. Each of these models has its own characteristics, particularly in terms of tax incentives, grant support, and integration requirements. The results of the study emphasize the important role of social entrepreneurship in promoting social and economic integration. The comparison of legal frameworks showed that different levels of support can affect the stability and efficiency of social enterprises. For example, the Social and Solidarity Economy model in France and the cooperative system in Italy emphasise the reinvestment of profits in social projects, the Community Interest Companies in Great Britain ensures transparency, and in South Korea enterprises receive subsidies for the employment of vulnerable groups. This indicates the adaptation of approaches to the specific national context. Thus, the study found that a clear and structured legal framework significantly contributes to the development of social entrepreneurship, providing stable financial support and the opportunity to achieve social inclusion through job creation, skills development and increased financial stability among marginalised groups


Keywords: community inclusion; vulnerable populations; inclusive economy; rights protection; policy development


Suggested citation

Ualiyeva, А., Zhempiissov, N., Zhabelova, T., & Nurgalym, K. (2024). Legal regulation of social entrepreneurship focused on the integration of marginalised groups into society. Social and Legal Studios, 7(4), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2024.170
References

[1] 2023 Delaware Code. (2023, October). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/title-8/chapter-1/subchapter-xv/section-363/.

[2] A world without harmful plastics: Bio-based and bio-degradable packaging solutions. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.skollcentre.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/Greenhope%20-%20Case%20Study.pdf.

[3] Adam, S., Avilés, G., Ferrari, D., Amstutz, J., Crivelli, L., Enrico, C., Gafner, A., Greppi, S., Schmitz, D., Wüthrich, B., & Zoebeli, D. (2016). Work integration social enterprises in Switzerland. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(4), 509-539. doi: 10.1515/npf-2016-0014.

[4] Akramov, G.N. (2024). Social work and marginalization: Strategies and methods of engagementInternational Scientific and Current Research Conferences, 1(1), 111-113.

[5] Anchal Project: Social impact. (2024). Retrieved from https://anchalproject.org/pages/social-impact.

[6] Andreadakis, S. (2023). Social enterprises, benefit corporations and community interest companies: The UK landscape. In H. Peter, C. Vargas Vasserot & J. Alcalde Silva (Eds.), The international handbook of social enterprise law: Benefit corporations and other purpose-driven companies (pp. 881-901). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14216-1_42.

[7] Asian Development Bank. (2012). India social enterprise: Landscape report. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank.

[8] Baker, J.J., & Weerakoon, C. (2024). Deepening insights into social entrepreneurship by leveraging Service-Dominant logic. Journal of Social Entrepreneurshipdoi: 10.1080/19420676.2024.2316801.

[9] Beach, D., & Vigo-Arrazola, M.B. (2024). Researching in solidarity with marginalised groups: A meta-ethnography about research for educational justice and social transformation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(10), 2981- 2996. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2024.2348783.

[10] Borshch, M. (2024). Legal mechanisms for improving the efficiency of accounting in the social security sector: Analysis of the regulatory environment and recommendations for improvement. Law. Human. Environment, 15(3), 9-30. doi: 10.31548/ law/3.2024.09.

[11] British Council. (2016). Report on social enterprises in India. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/bc-report-ch4-india-digital_0.pdf.

[12] Carrera, D., Meneguzzo, M., & Messina, A. (2007). Solidarity-based economy in Italy. Retrieved from https://base.socioeco.org/docs/solidarity-_based_economy_in_italy._dario_carrera_et_al.pdf.

[13] Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., & Starnawska, M. (2021). Social enterprise in Poland: Institutional and historical context. In Social enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe: Institutional and historical context (pp. 138-151). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429324529-10.

[14] Ciepielewska-Kowalik, A., Pieliński, B., Starnawska, M., & Szymańska, A. (2015). Social enterprise in Poland: Institutional and historical contextICSEM Working Papers, 11.

[15] Community Interest Company Regulations of United Kingdome. (2005, June). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ uksi/2005/1788/contents/made.

[16] Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act of United Kingdome. (2004, December). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/27/contents.

[17] Czuba, M. (2019). The use of social entrepreneurship in the field of municipal services to build social security of people threatened by social exclusion. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences, 9(1), 205-214. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.3044.

[18] Delaware public benefit corporations – recent developments. (2020). Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/08/31/delaware-public-benefit-corporations-recent-developments/.

[19] European Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2015). Comparative analysis of the regulatory framework for social enterprises. Retrieved from https://ecnl.org/sites/default/files/files/ECNL-Comparative-analysis-on-regulation-of-SE-Eng-2015.pdf.

[20] European Commission. (2024). Social economy strategy in Ile-de-France region. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

[21] Fairtrade America. (2024). Divine chocolate impact. Retrieved from https://www.fairtradeamerica.org/why-fairtrade/global-impact/impact-stories/dc/.

[22] Gazilas, E.T. (2024). Empirical analysis on the impact of labour market regulations on uninsured employment in Greece. Economics of Development, 23(1), 8-17. doi: 10.57111/econ/1.2024.08.

[23] Goonj. (2023). Humanity and circularity for climate action. Retrieved from https://goonj.org/annual-reports/.

[24] Kalyuzhna, N., Smutchak, Z., Chorna, N., Chornyi, R., Baldyniuk, O., & Chuba, R. (2024). Toolkit for multi-vector adaptation and development of corporate culture of international companies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 927 LNNS, 501-514. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-54009-7_45.

[25] Kidd, S., & McKenzie, K. (2014). Social entrepreneurship and services for marginalised groups. Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care, 7(1), 3-13. doi: 10.1108/EIHSC-03-2013-0004.

[26] Kim, T.H., & Moon, M.J. (2017). Using social enterprises for social policy in South Korea: Do funding and management affect social and economic performance? Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 15-27. doi: 10.1002/pad.1783.

[27] Koshkinbaeva, A.S., Shaigaliyev, M.G., Buribayev, Y.A., Khamzina, Z.A., & Khamzina, S.S. (2019). International legal regulation of environmental safety: In focus – Kazakhstan. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita, 1, 121-142. doi: 10.3280/RISS2019-001008.

[28] Kovach, D., Kullolli, B., Djaparova, S., Mikhnevych, L., & Myskovets, I. (2024). Legal aspects of environmental sustainability and climate change: the role of international and national legislation. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 4(2), 149-179. doi: 10.33002/jelp040206.

[29] Law of France No. 2014-856 “On the Social and Solidarity Economy”. (2014, July). Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000029313296.

[30] Law of Italy No. 381 “Discipline of Social Cooperatives”. (1991, November). Retrieved from https://www.bosettiegatti.eu/info/norme/statali/1991_0381.htm.

[31] Liptrap, J.S. (2021). British social enterprise law. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 21(2), 595-630. doi: 10.1080/14735970.2021.1959990.

[32] Mair, J., & Rathert, N. (2024). The political side of social enterprises: A phenomenon-based study of sociocultural and policy advocacy. Journal of Management Studiesdoi: 10.1111/joms.13134.

[33] Miquel. (2013). Our role as a social enterprise in the industry. Retrieved from https://www.fairphone.com/en/2013/06/20/our-role-as-a-social-enterprise-in-the-industry/.

[34] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2021). Italyʼs contribution on discrimination, segregation and the right to adequate housing. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Housing/ SubmissionsCFIhousingdiscrimin/input-italy.docx.

[35] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). The law on the social and solidarity economy (SSE), France. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264268500-en.

[36] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Designing legal frameworks for social enterprises: Practical guidance for policy makers. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/19901097.

[37] Petrella, F., & Richez-Battesti, N. (2014). Social entrepreneur, social entrepreneurship and social enterprise: Semantics and controversies. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 14(2), 143-156. doi: 10.3917/jie.014.0143.

[38] Singh, N.K., & Kumar, P. (2023). Analysing social entrepreneurshipʼs legal and regulatory frameworks using collaborative innovation. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), article number e1188. doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1188.

[39] Snowden, M., Towns-Andrews, L., Halsall, J.P., Oberoi, R., & Mswaka, W. (2024). Integrating social policy dimensions into entrepreneurship education: A perspective from India. Entrepreneurship Education, 7, 237-262. doi: 10.1007/s41959-024- 00125-6.

[40] Social Enterprise Promotion Act of the Republic of Korea. (2007, January). Retrieved from https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/ viewer.do?hseq=24346&type=part&key=40.

[41] Sofia, J. (2018). Sitti soap: A social enterprise. Retrieved from https://www.launchgood.com/v4/campaign/sitti_soap_a_social_ enterprise.

[42] Stryjan, Y. (2023). Work integration social enterprises in Sweden. Retrieved from https://emes.net/content/uploads/publications/ PERSE_WP_04-02_S.pdf.

[43] Terziev, V. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as an opportunity to model an active social programInternational E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 3(8), 489-495.

[44] Van Lierop, C. (2016). Cohesion policy and marginalised communities. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/BRIE/2016/589806/EPRS_BRI%282016%29589806_EN.pdf.

[45] Vasserot, C.V. (2022). Legal regulation of social enterprises in other European countries. In H. Peter, C. Vargas Vasserot & J. Alcalde Silva (Eds.), The international handbook of social enterprise law (pp. 941-950). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14216-1_45.

[46] Yatsiv, I., Pavlenchyk, N., Pavlenchyk, A., Krupa, V., & Yatsiv, S. (2024). Basic principles of corporate social responsibility management under martial law. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 11(1), 103-113. doi: 10.52566/msu-econ1.2024.103.