Abstract
After the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in 2012, the issues related to the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings have received constant attention of the scientific community. This is explained by the fact that within the institution of measures to ensure criminal proceedings, the legislator has combined measures, the application of which is inevitably associated with coercion and a high degree of restriction of the rights and freedoms of individuals. The existing experience of enforcement of the relevant provisions of the CPC of Ukraine has demonstrated the imperfection of the legal institution of measures to ensure, which creates a basis for the formation of ambiguous law enforcement practice. Examination and resolution of requests to enforce measures to ensure criminal proceedings by the investigating judge is impossible without an active process of proof. In this regard, the doctrine required a scientific study of the implementation of key rules of criminal procedural proving during the examination of requests to enforce measures to ensure criminal proceedings by investigating judge and the court. V.A. Zavtur’s monograph is response to this request. Peer-reviewed work consists of three sections, which contain 11 subsections. The monograph can be successfully used for further scientific research in the relevant field, in the educational process by teachers and graduates, as well as practitioners in criminal proceedings. Monograph of V.A. Zavtur “Features of proving in the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings by the investigating judge and the court: theory and practice” fully meets the requirements for scientific publications of this level, is a relevant and timely scientific work that solves an important scientific problem. It has a high theoretical and practical value
Keywords: criminal procedural proof, measures to ensure criminal proceedings, measures of restraint, investigating judge, court
Suggested citation